Right now I feel like I've been struck with divine inspiration. Hope I
don't wake up tomorrow feeling like an idiot. :-)
Town E-meeting is a way to
- disseminate information about competing proposals
- allow a controlled debate and negotiation among supporters of the
various proposals
-
Kathy,
Your report is not peer-reviewed as that term is nearly universally
used. I know you have not dealt with flaws in your report presented by
Chris Benham and me... You asked for specifics...so...In Appendix B on
page 16, for example, you present a voting scenario where you claim
Approval
Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
You use movie site data for your AAR-DSV examples. Does AAR-DSV
manipulability mean that a movie site that uses it would face
difficulty telling users which movie is the most popular or highest
rated? The manipulability proofs wouldn't harm them as strongly (since
Kristofer Munsterhjelm Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 1:25 PM
I don't doubt that the problem exists. After all, the term decoy list
(lista civetta) comes from the Italian abuse of the system.
Do you know of any countries that do have overhang provisions to
ameliorate the problem?
While I am
Dear Jobst,
Here's my die toss version of your FAWRB method:
1. Draw a ballot at random.
2. If this ballot does not approve the AW, THEN elect its favorite (and STOP).
Else continue to step 3.
3. With the help of dice, coins, spinner, balls and urn, or an icosahedron
with numbered
