FairVote is like a politician who tells people what they want to
hear. That's the art of spin. When it gets repugnant is when what's
being said is false. A post to the Approval Voting list, from which
I'm still banned from posting, referred to an article in the LA
times. It's worth noting that
Kristofer,
You wrote (Sun.Nov.23):
Regarding number two, simple Condorcet methods exist. Borda-elimination
(Nanson or Raynaud) is Condorcet. Minmax is quite simple, and everybody
who's dealt with sports knows Copeland (with Minmax tiebreaks). I'll
partially grant this, though, since the good
Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote (Sat.Nov.29):
-snip-
I don't know of any method that meets the MDQBR you refer to that isn't
completely invulnerable to Burial (do you?), so I don't see how that criterion
is
presently useful.
That's odd, because the example I gave in a reply to Juho was yours.
