Hi!
I am planning to initialize a referenda in my country to change our voting
system.
I want to propose Condorcet, and want to draft the referenda question in a
way which makes no room for the legistrator to fall back to some ancient
method when there is no Condorcet winner. I prefer Schulze
Hello,
I can suggest:
Do you agree to vote our parliament members with the Schulze version of
Condorcet methods?
For which country?
Stéphane, curious...
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:46:27 +0200
From: mag...@rabic.org
To: election-methods@lists.electorama.com
Subject: [EM] simple
Hallo,
this is my suggestion:
Shall the current election method be replaced
by the Schulze method, a preferential
and Condorcet-consistent single-winner
election method?
Markus Schulze
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
Árpád,
I have two questions.
(1) How is the legislature of your country currently elected? As James
Gilmour also said, replacing a proportional method with single-member
districts would be a big step backwards.
(2) Does your country have a directly-elected President, or elected
mayors in
Hallo,
Bob Richard wrote (4 June 2009):
I did not consider the possibility that the country
in question would have a mixed member proportional
system. In this case, there are 175 single-seat
constituencies, plus two more tiers, one parallel
(I think) and one compensatory.
By the way, I
You could try to describe the very central
Condorcet principle in an understandable
way and then add Schulze as an attribute
(just as a name that is not explained in
detail) if you want and need to point out
that particular Condorcet method.
Maybe something like Would you like to
use the Schulze
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Juho Laatujuho4...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Maybe something like Would you like to
use the Schulze method that always elects
the candidate that would win every other
candidate?
What about
Would you like to elect the candidate would win one on one against
every
2009/6/4 James Gilmour jgilm...@globalnet.co.uk
Markus, UK electors have no hope of understanding that
question at all after any campaign, never mind not instantly.
And of those who would vote, large numbers would go to vote
with very little prior information.
Just two weeks before
I guess the list might have opininons in this discussion.
2009/6/4 Warren Smith warren@gmail.com
I am using winning strategy in the game theory sense.
--voting is then an N-player game with N very large.
Most or all attempts to look at voting in that way have been unsuccessful.
Game
