Re: [EM] Forced strictly-dishonest strategy is common in Schulze-beatpaths voting

2009-06-14 Thread Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Dan Bishop wrote: You can't just assume that people would vote strategically in Schulze elections because they vote strategically in Plurality elections. The question of what strategy will be used and to what extent is a quite difficult one. On one hand, individually speaking, voting is not

Re: [EM] Forced strictly-dishonest strategy is common inSchulze-beatpaths voting

2009-06-14 Thread James Gilmour
Jan Kok Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 12:50 AM Warren wrote: I have news for you.   The concept of strategic voting is entirely about caring more about  vanishingly small gains in utility than about honesty. It's not vanishingly small if you think about it from a team perspective.