[EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not

2009-10-30 Thread Kathy Dopp
People keep asking me how to achieve a proportional representation system so talking out loud... A fair proportional multiseat STV representation system could be made by eliminating STV's elimination rounds but using the rank choices to transfer partial votes to a 2nd choice candidate in

Re: [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not

2009-10-30 Thread Raph Frank
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Kathy Dopp kathy.d...@gmail.com wrote: In other words, for a multi-seat election where we want proportional representation, limit voters' choices to a 1st and 2nd choice and count all voters' 1st choices and transfer excess votes to the voters' 2nd choices and

Re: [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not

2009-10-30 Thread James Gilmour
Kathy Dopp Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 4:45 PM talking out loud... You were indeed talking out loud. From you posts over several years it would APPEAR that you have no real appreciation of the purpose of a proportional representation voting system. If you have such an appreciation, it

[EM] A less artificial multiwinner Kemeny method

2009-10-30 Thread Kristofer Munsterhjelm
In an earlier message, A multiwinner election method based on Kemeny, I detailed an extension of the idea of Kemeny-Young to handle multiple winners, by assigning each voter to a candidate rank to which the Kemeny distance between his ballot and the candidate rank was the least, and using the