Hallo,
here are some interesting videos on IRV in Burlington:
http://www.cctv.org/watch-tv/programs/instant-runoff-voting-interviews
http://www.cctv.org/watch-tv/programs/irv-or-down-instant-runoff-voting-debate
I have the impression that there was no reasonable
debate on IRV. Most anti-IRV
On Mar 22, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Markus Schulze wrote:
here are some interesting videos on IRV in Burlington:
http://www.cctv.org/watch-tv/programs/instant-runoff-voting-interviews
http://www.cctv.org/watch-tv/programs/irv-or-down-instant-runoff-
voting-debate
i've seen them. if i had reacted
Upon cursory reflection and in response to my strong opposition to any
nonmonotonic method and to any method that fail to treat all voters'
votes equally, the only proportional method I know I would support for
legislative representation would be the party list system where
candidates appear only
Kathy Dopp wrote:
Upon cursory reflection and in response to my strong opposition to any
nonmonotonic method and to any method that fail to treat all voters'
votes equally, the only proportional method I know I would support for
legislative representation would be the party list system where
Dear Robert,
are you the questioner at 00:42:00 -- 00:44:25?
Markus Schulze
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
After reading the post on measuring multiwinner goodness (and writing a
reply to it), I started to think of how to determine how good the
different multiwinner methods actually are.
One way to do that is by criterion compliance. But there is another:
while proportionality can't be expressed
Kristofer Munsterhjelm Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 9:24 PM
I think your more complex party list PR (with cross endorsement) could
work while still passing all three criteria. It's certainly summable and
proportional, so the only difficulty would be in making it monotone.
Simply
On Mar 22, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Markus Schulze wrote:
Dear Robert,
are you the questioner at 00:42:00 -- 00:44:25?
it could be. i dunno if i wanna load the video again and figure that
out. i was pointing out that the purpose we adopted IRV in the first
place was to relieve the split
