Dear all,
I am sending a post scriptum to the email below.
1. The conservative method is only interesting if, the unambiguously
pre-elected president and vice president(s) are not in the set of
proportionally (for instance STV) elected council members.
2. If the unambiguously elected president
On May 3, 2010, at 3:51 AM, Peter Zbornik wrote:
Dear all,
if the single-winner president or the proportionally elected VPs
sometimes are not a member of the set of proportionally elected
council members (which is likely),
Possible but maybe not very common.
then I would also like to ask
Dear Raph Frank,
you wrote (3 May 2010):
For the rest of the council, I think electing
them using Schulze-STV with the restriction
that only results where the President and VP
are members are allowed would give better
proportionality.
If I understand Peter Zbornik correctly, then he
wants
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Markus Schulze
markus.schu...@alumni.tu-berlin.de wrote:
Dear Raph Frank,
you wrote (3 May 2010):
For the rest of the council, I think electing
them using Schulze-STV with the restriction
that only results where the President and VP
are members are
2010/5/3 Juho juho4...@yahoo.co.uk:
(What I mean by distorting effect is that if you have left, centre and
right, and centre has less first place support than the other two, then a
good approach may be to elect C if one elects only one representative. But
if one elects two then one could pick
On May 3, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Raph Frank wrote:
2010/5/3 Juho juho4...@yahoo.co.uk:
(What I mean by distorting effect is that if you have left,
centre and
right, and centre has less first place support than the other two,
then a
good approach may be to elect C if one elects only one
On May 3, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Peter Zbornik wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Markus Schulze markus.schu...@alumni.tu-berlin.de
wrote:
Dear Raph Frank,
you wrote (3 May 2010):
For the rest of the council, I think electing
them using Schulze-STV with the restriction
that only results
Peter Zbornik Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:07 PM
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Markus Schulze
If I understand Peter Zbornik correctly, then he
wants a ranking of the members of the council, so
that it is clear who the 2nd vice president, the
3rd vice president, the 4th vice
Hi!
Here is the new (and as far as I am concerned now, ready) version of my
little voting program.
It is designed to be used in a village meeting where there is only one
computer, and too much people to cast votes one by one.
In the rows of the vote tab you give the candidates, and the number of
For years, voting systems were studied through the use of criteria,
standards which a system either passes or fails. These criteria often
assumed a preference order, sometimes assuming that this preference
order exists outside what is expressed on the ballot. Arrow's
accomplishment was in
Peter Zbornik wrote:
Dear all,
I am sending a post scriptum to the email below.
1. The conservative method is only interesting if, the unambiguously
pre-elected president and vice president(s) are not in the set of
proportionally (for instance STV) elected council members.
2. If the
Kevin and Chris,
You’re both right, my “proof” only showed that raising the winner W could not
hurt her prospects on
ballots where she was already approved or on ballots where she was rated at the
highest currently
unapproved level. But , as Kevin pointed out, if there were candidates at two
12 matches
Mail list logo
