Clearly, MCA-Asset as I originally stated it is too complex. So here's a
simpler revision. From here on, MCA-Asset will refer to the following
system:
As before, it's an MCA variant, so the basic MCA rules are the same. Voters
rate candidates into N categories, including the default bottom-rating
Just a note about non-monotonicity in MCA-Asset: the actual result of the
scenario I talked about would be that C voters would defensively approve B,
and so B (the PC / CW) would win.
2011/2/26 Jameson Quinn jameson.qu...@gmail.com
Clearly, MCA-Asset as I originally stated it is too complex. So
Kristofer Munsterhjelm Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 2:29 PM
I'm not a UK politics expert, but it seems this is a minimal
concession,
of the sort one would see in negotiation. AV/IRV doesn't really lead to
multiparty systems, if Australia is to be any judge. Instead, you get
two
