On 10.6.2011, at 3.04, Kevin Venzke wrote:
Hi Juho,
--- En date de : Jeu 9.6.11, Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk a écrit :
No, I wouldn't say that. I do think there are methods
that offer two
bad options and one of them is burial, though.
(There is no working strategy, but there are
SODA is essentially a procedure for turning a mixture of inter-candidate
rankings, bullet votes, and approval ballots, into a set of approval
ballots. So any PR system which accepts a set of approval ballots can then
be applied, to turn it into a PR system.
I'm not aware of many approval-based PR
Jameson,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Jameson Quinn jameson.qu...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not aware of many approval-based PR systems, though. Perhaps it's my
own ignorance, but the only ones I know of are RAV and the two-ranked case
of a complicated, unpublished Bucklin-based system I've
Jameson Quinn wrote:
SODA is essentially a procedure for turning a mixture of inter-candidate
rankings, bullet votes, and approval ballots, into a set of approval
ballots. So any PR system which accepts a set of approval ballots can
then be applied, to turn it into a PR system.
I'm not aware
Thank you to Kristofer and Andy for the references. As they and I'm sure
many others have realized, my example was wrong.
I'm still interested in how strategy would work when combining SODA with a
multiwinner approval-balloted method.
JQ
2011/6/10 Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_el...@lavabit.com
A preliminary web page on this topic is now available here
http://rangevoting.org/TheorDistrict.html
Your comments would be appreciated to help me improve this page.
[There is a much longer scientific paper in the works by me others
on this, but it unfortunately has been in the works several
I second the idea. Any PR method based on approval ballots could be
implemented in this way.
The main advantage of Range or Approval based methods for PR when compared to
STV is shown in the
following two winner example:
30 A(100)X(90)
20 B(100)X(90)
30 C(100)Y(90)
20 D(100)Y(90)
with
On 9.6.2011, at 4.54, Kevin Venzke wrote:
Hi Juho,
--- En date de : Mer 8.6.11, Juho Laatu juho.la...@gmail.com a écrit :
I was busy with other activities for a while but here are
some comments.
--- En date de : Mer 1.6.11, Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
a écrit :
I agree with Kevin
On 9.6.2011, at 5.48, Jameson Quinn wrote:
It seems I have to give one more example to cover also
cases where the difference between major an minor candidates
is not that clear.
26: AB
25: BA
49: C
Again, if two of the B supporters vote BC, then B wins.
If some A and B
