Jameson Quinn wrote:
2011/10/25 Kristofer Munsterhjelm km_el...@lavabit.com
mailto:km_el...@lavabit.com
Jameson Quinn wrote:
* A multimember-district system helps with the above
problems, but
doesn't actually solve them. Who wants a system where
-methods-boun...@lists.electorama.com] On Behalf Of Juho Laatu
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 5:11 PM
To: EM
Subject: Re: [EM] Proportional, Accountable,Local (PAL) representation: isn't
this a big deal?
On 29.10.2011, at 16.58, James Gilmour wrote:
Kristofer Munsterhjelm Sent: Saturday
] On Behalf Of Juho Laatu
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 5:11 PM
To: EM
Subject: Re: [EM] Proportional, Accountable,Local (PAL) representation: isn't
this a big deal?
On 29.10.2011, at 16.58, James Gilmour wrote:
Kristofer Munsterhjelm Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 9:14 AM
STV is not mixed
2011/10/25 Andy Jennings electi...@jenningsstory.com
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jameson Quinn
jameson.qu...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/10/25 Andy Jennings electi...@jenningsstory.com
Hi Jameson,
I looked over it. I didn't see any technical problems immediately, but
I'm going to
OK, I'm turning into a bit of a spammer on this issue, but...
Here's some discussion of PAL representation's legality in the
UShttp://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/PAL_representation#Note_on_legality_in_US.
A state could pass a law to use FMV (a true proportional system) until the
anti-PR federal law
From: Jameson Quinn jameson.qu...@gmail.com
Here's some discussion of PAL representation's legality in the
UShttp://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/PAL_representation#Note_on_legality_in_US.
A state could pass a law to use FMV (a true proportional system) until the
anti-PR federal law is repealed,
