Re: [EM] Usability studies of ranking/rating/approval methods

2011-06-02 Thread James Gilmour
t; [mailto:election-methods-boun...@lists.electorama.com] On > Behalf Of Steve Wolfman > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 8:53 PM > To: election-meth...@electorama.com > Subject: [EM] Usability studies of ranking/rating/approval methods > > > There's been some recent

[EM] Usability studies of ranking/rating/approval methods

2011-06-01 Thread Warren Smith
see http://rangevoting.org/SPRates.html http://www.rangevoting.org/French2007studies.html -- Warren D. Smith http://RangeVoting.org <-- add your endorsement (by clicking "endorse" as 1st step) and math.temple.edu/~wds/homepage/works.html Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama

[EM] Usability studies of ranking/rating/approval methods

2011-06-01 Thread Steve Wolfman
There's been some recent discussion of which ballots are easiest to use. Does anyone know of published (experimental) studies of usability of non-plurality ballots (perhaps vs. plurality ballots)? I'd be happy to take personal responses and summarize for anyone who would rather not post to the