-- Forwarded message --
From: Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
dlw: But I'd argue that to make our two-party system work better, we
need to provide a constructive role for 3rd parties in it. This wd be
accomplished by the use of 3-seat LR Hare in state reps elections. If
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
dlw: But I'd argue that to make our two-party system work better, we need
to provide a constructive role for 3rd parties in it. This wd be
accomplished by the use of 3-seat LR Hare in state reps elections. If the
On 13.2.2012, at 16.28, David L Wetzell wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
dlw: But I'd argue that to make our two-party system work better, we need
to provide a constructive role for 3rd parties in it. This wd be
accomplished by the use
-methods@lists.electorama.com
Cc:
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 22:07:07 +0200
Subject: Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism.
On 9.2.2012, at 17.21, David L Wetzell wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
To: EM list election-methods@lists.electorama.com
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
To: EM list election-methods@lists.electorama.com
Cc:
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:29:02 +0200
Subject: Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism.
On 8.2.2012, at 16.18, David L Wetzell wrote:
...
dlw:At any rate
On Feb 8, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Juho Laatu wrote:
On 8.2.2012, at 16.18, David L Wetzell wrote:
...
At any rate, this is why I've argued that ascertaining the best
single-winner election rule is nowhere near as important as
pitching the importance of mixing the use of single-winner and
On 9.2.2012, at 17.21, David L Wetzell wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juho Laatu juho4...@yahoo.co.uk
To: EM list election-methods@lists.electorama.com
Cc:
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:29:02 +0200
Subject: Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism.
On 8.2.2012, at 16.18
As I earlier wrote, I think the US has many options on how to go forward with
the reform. The presidential election is maybe the most interetsting one. If
one uses Condorcet, that means that the president may come from a minor party
or be independent. Let's say that there is an independent
Juho LaatuSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:29 PM
I think I agree when I say that the first decision (in the
USA) is whether to make the current two-party system work
better or whether to aim at a multi-party system.
Juho
Don't you think you might just be starting in the wrong
Juho LaatuSent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 8:07 PM
As I earlier wrote, I think the US has many options on how to
go forward with the reform. The presidential election is
maybe the most interesting one.
Juho
This may be the most interesting election, but as it is almost certainly the
On 10.2.2012, at 2.02, James Gilmour wrote:
Juho LaatuSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:29 PM
I think I agree when I say that the first decision (in the
USA) is whether to make the current two-party system work
better or whether to aim at a multi-party system.
Juho
Don't you
On 10.2.2012, at 2.17, James Gilmour wrote:
Juho LaatuSent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 8:07 PM
As I earlier wrote, I think the US has many options on how to
go forward with the reform. The presidential election is
maybe the most interesting one.
Juho
This may be the most
On 8.2.2012, at 16.18, David L Wetzell wrote:
...
At any rate, this is why I've argued that ascertaining the best single-winner
election rule is nowhere near as important as pitching the importance of
mixing the use of single-winner and multi-winner election rules, with the
latter
13 matches
Mail list logo
