On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Kathy Dopp kathy.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Yikes Raph. I didn't know that the method was potentially
nonmonotonic. I oppose all nonmonotonic methods.
Yeah, I know. I brought it up in the interests of honesty.
However, there is another thread titled A monotonic
14, 2010 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [EM] Voting systems theory and proportional representation
vssimple representation. (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax)
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Kathy Dopp kathy.d...@gmail.com wrote:
A great proportional representation system, although I don't
think there would
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Terry Bouricius
ter...@burlingtontelecom.net wrote:
Ralph is describing the open list system used in such places as the
Netherlands (nation-wide) and Finland (regionally).
I was thinking of a system with 1 list per candidate, rather than 1
list per party. This
Kathy Dopp Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 8:54 PM
Abd ul, I agree with virtually all you say that I had time to
read, but would prefer party list voting over asset voting
simply because it forces the #1 elector, as you put it, to
state in advance who he will nominate with any excess votes
