On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:41:12 -0700 Kathy Dopp wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:55:41 -0500
From: Dave Ketchum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Election-Methods] RE : Re: Fwd: FYI - FairVote MN
RespondstoLawsuit Against IRV
James' discussion of history leading up to IRV makes
On Dec 26, 2007 6:53 PM, Juho Laatu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Condocet methods do not put any additional weight on first position
on the ballot. Vote GoreBushPaulNader is considered to be equally
strong in saying Gore is better than Bush than e.g. vote
NaderPaulGoreBush.
Juho,
Thanks for
Thanks Dave,
I think I understand Condorcet now and what the = signs are for, and I
like Condorcet and see no immediate drawbacks to its tabulation method
like I do to the IRV tabulation method.
I would urge that we get a handle on ensuring that our vote counts are
accurate prior to using any
-
What do you think of this lawsuit?
Kathy
-- Forwarded message --
From: Raging Grannie (Wanda B) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 22, 2007 8:19 PM
Subject: FYI - FairVote MN Responds to Lawsuit Against IRV
go to http://fairvotemn.orgFairVoteMN.org if you have trouble viewing
this