Dear Chris!
You wrote:
I like this table.
Thanks.
Doesn't AM look like the most natural and balanced?
Yes, but that's only an aesthetical judgement...
I was wondering if it is possible in AM for a
candidate who is both the sincere CW and sincere AW to
successfully Buried, and I've come
Hello James and All,
On Mar 26, 2005, at 14:05, James Green-Armytage wrote:
Yes, but you've not yet understood the virtue of cardinal-weighted
pairwise and approval-weighted pairwise. I request that you read my
cardinal pairwise paper, as most of the arguments used therein apply to
AWP as well.
Hi Juho,
Some replies follow, on the subject of voter strategy and
approval-weighted pairwise. These comments should also be helpful for
others who don't understand why I consider AWP to be clearly better than
DMC and AM.
The voting method sees only the altered votes. Although the sincere
Hello Chris,
I have one generic comment on evaluation of different voting methods.
Examples that include both sincere votes and altered votes nicely
demonstrate the possibilities of strategic voting, but when the voting
method gets a pile of ballots to be counted, no knowledge of which
votes
Dear Chris!
First, I'd like to emphasize that DMC, AWP, and AM can be thought of as
being essentially the same method with only different definition of
defeat strength, so it seems quite natural to compare them in detail as
you started.
Recall that the DMC winner is the unique immune candidate
