Blake wrote:
The main argument that has been brought in favour of Schulze is that
in a simulation, it achieved a slightly better approximation of
ratings than did Ranked Pairs, both falling behind Borda. It seems to
me that there are problems with choosing Schulze on this basis. There
is
Rob LeGrand wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">There may be a Condorcet completion method that satisfies the same criteria and is better on SU, butsomehow I doubt it.
I was thinking about this recently. If a completion method is going to be biased toward
higher SU, then it will have to be able to pick a
Rob wrote:
One reason the beatpath idea appeals to me so much, despite the fact that
it's
not obviously optimal, is that it's so simple. It may not be as intuitive
as
Ranked Pairs to the average voter, but to me it's mathematically more
aesthetically pleasing, whatever that means. There may be
