Hi, just an idea. Why not add this feature into bake?, something like that
bake new project name=sky
On Sep 17, 2013 10:39 PM, "Albert Palacios" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Julian suggested a new template without using the word 'template', so here
> it is. Now it uses "HelloWorld" as a project name and it
Hi,
Julian suggested a new template without using the word 'template', so here
it is. Now it uses "HelloWorld" as a project name and it can be easily
changed using the script 'set_project_name.sh'.
For example, to create a new application named 'sky':
- Decompress the template
- mv helloworld sk
I've taken a look at Bake, and I'm liking it so far!
As soon as optional dependencies support is added (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bake/+bug/1105831), I will try to get Files
built with it.
2013/9/14 Julien
> Hey guys,
>
> I've lately been toying with a relatively recent build system called *
Awesome to hear good news on Bake! Thanks Julien and the other
Elementaryites for trying it out; your feedback is very useful.
As many have pointed out, Bake is quite new and progress might seem to be a
little slow. This is two things really:
1. I really want to do a good job of it (no point addin
Hi,
Thanks to Julien's proposal I have created and "empty" project template
(the one attached it to this email). I hope it helps someone to begin with
new projects.
This project uses the word "template" not only in filenames but also inside
files.
In the project there is one script named 'set_pr
2013/9/15 Julien
> sudo apt-get install maki
>
I wonder if you can declare runtime dependencies in Bake, such as Maki in
this case.
--
Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff
OS architect @ elementary
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
Post to : elementary-dev-community@l
sudo apt-get install maki
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Albert Palacios
wrote:
Hi Julien,
Not working yet :s, the "Software Center" didn't show the icon
properly, after installing the deb:
[_LOG_LEVEL_INFO 13:46:24.346737] Application.vala:77: Cable version:
0.1
[_LOG_LEVEL_INFO 13:46
Seems normal. Still not working?
Try what shnatsel said and run bake release-deb and then install the
.deb file.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Albert Palacios
wrote:
sudo bake uninstall
sudo bake clean
sudo bake install >> install_out.txt
I attached the out.
albert@albertPC:~/Projects/
I can confirm that at least the generated .deb's work as expected.
"make install" and "bake install" are evil and you should forget they exist
if you don't like hunting totally mysterious bugs for hours that ultimately
turn out to be stale versions of files you long forgot existed.
--
Sergey "Shn
Those options.xxx variables are not defined in the Recipe files, but
have default values, in this case /usr/share
Anyway, can you post bake's output on pastebin? First uninstall and
clean, then install again.
Also, please run $ find /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/ | grep cable
On Sun, Sep 15, 2
Bake should output something like this:
$ sudo bake install
[Configuring]
install-directory - / (default)
system-config-directory - /etc (default)
system-binary-directory - /sbin (default)
system-library-directory - /lib (default)
resource-directory - /usr (default)
binary-directory -
Bake installs the gsettings schema automatically.
Did you install cable like I described?
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Albert Palacios
wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile it, I want to begin a new application and I
will use your bake structure as an example. But I get:
albert@albert-Ma
Here's a branch for building Terminal with bake. The Recipe files are
almost the same, I just had to adjust the version, gettext-package,
sources-files and a few other details.
https://code.launchpad.net/~julien-spautz/pantheon-terminal/bake
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Julien wrote:
Hey
Julien, thanks for stepping up to investigate Bake. It had to be done :)
I believe migrating to Bake would be very beneficial since it lowers the
entry barrier and lets developers focus on code. I'd like to hear from
developers on the matter, though.
I do have some gripes with the current state o
>
> There are a lot of build system out there. This one seems cool and clean
> but it's probably too bleeding edge. I suggest you to take a look at waf.
> Lots of project are switching to it.
>
We've been through WAF already. Oh, what a nightmare it was!
WAF is very basic and doesn't have even get
I know that Robert also has built bake with the intention of having it work
from a GUI IDE as well as with the intention of having it integrate into
launchpad. He has an excellent track record if that means anything :)
Best Regards,
Daniel Foré
elementaryos.org
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:08 PM
I haven't used waf yet, do you know of any good resources?
From what I've seen after a quick web search it seems to be just as
verbose as cmake or even make. The point of bake is that it is so
stupidly simple to use, and also has special support for vala.
It makes things like installing deskt
"Debian considers Waf problematic due to being binary-distributed
On Windows its pkg-config handling leaves to be desired"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/midori/+bug/1211909
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Daniele S. wrote:
> There are a lot of build system out there. This one seems cool and clean
There are a lot of build system out there. This one seems cool and clean
but it's probably too bleeding edge. I suggest you to take a look at waf.
Lots of project are switching to it.
Daniele
Il giorno 15/set/2013 01:08, "Julien" ha scritto:
> Hey guys,
>
> I've lately been toying with a relativ
Hey guys,
I've lately been toying with a relatively recent build system called
bake. It was created and is maintained by Robert Ancell and you can
find the source code here: https://launchpad.net/bake.
There isn't much documentation out there, but the manual will teach you
most important thi
20 matches
Mail list logo
