Re: [PATCH] libebl: Don't install libebl.a, libebl.h and remove backends from spec.

2020-01-09 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Dmitry, On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 02:25 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 03:09:32PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Even if you could use libasm.h, linking with libasm always was kind > > of > > useless since there was no supported way to create an Ebl handle. > > Unless you

Re: rfc/patch: debuginfod client $DEBUGINFOD_PROGRESS env var

2020-01-09 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 11:44 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > > > > That suggests one timeout could be sufficient - the progress > > > timeout > > > you the one you found - just not too short and not too fast. > > > > How about the attached (untested) patch? I finally tested it in various

Re: rfc/patch: user-agent distro-description for debuginfod http traffic

2020-01-09 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - > > > We do want a reproducible build. > > > > Can you give an example? Bootstrapping a new distro version/arch? > > Probably best explained at https://reproducible-builds.org/ most > distributions are participating. (I understood that part, just not how you thought build-time literals