Re: Using in-memory database (Was: Buildbot failure in Wildebeest Builder on whole buildset)

2021-08-28 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-devel
Hi - > That is really cool and imho really useful for quick testing of debuginfod. > What do you think of the attached patch to implement this? chef's kiss - FChE

Using in-memory database (Was: Buildbot failure in Wildebeest Builder on whole buildset)

2021-08-28 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Frank, On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:41:30AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-devel wrote: > > At first I had hoped that using -d :memory: would work. But debuginfod > > doesn't really support in memory databases like that. [...] > > Yes, that functionality was broken at the point you

Re: Buildbot failure in Wildebeest Builder on whole buildset

2021-08-28 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-devel
Hi - > This took me a while to figure out because it does not consistently > fail. It turns out that sharing a database between two debuginfod > instances (especially if they forward queries to each other) is not a > good idea. That's correct. Each test case invocation of debuginfod should be

Re: Buildbot failure in Wildebeest Builder on whole buildset

2021-08-28 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:19:14PM +, build...@builder.wildebeest.org wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder elfutils-debian-amd64 > while building elfutils. > Full details are available at: > https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/#builders/2/builds/803 > >

Re: Buildbot failure in Wildebeest Builder on whole buildset

2021-08-28 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 09:20:22PM +, build...@builder.wildebeest.org wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder elfutils-centos-x86_64 > while building elfutils. > Full details are available at: > https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/#builders/1/builds/807 > >

Re: [PATCH v2] Improve building with LTO

2021-08-28 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 03:38:56AM +0100, Alexander Miller via Elfutils-devel wrote: > From: Alexander Miller > > Use symver attribute for symbol versioning instead of .symver > assembler directive when available. Convert to use double @ syntax > for default version in all cases (required when