Resending with a X-PTS-Approved header.
On 08/01/23 23:28 +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo said ...
> Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > See also: http://bugs.debian.org/331409#57
>
> Thank you for the pointer. However, I think it would be wrong
> to reopen bug 331409 for the B
On 08/01/23 23:28 +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo said ...
> Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > See also: http://bugs.debian.org/331409#57
>
> Thank you for the pointer. However, I think it would be wrong
> to reopen bug 331409 for the Bash-ELinks interaction, because
> it was
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See also: http://bugs.debian.org/331409#57
Thank you for the pointer. However, I think it would be wrong
to reopen bug 331409 for the Bash-ELinks interaction, because
it was originally about a busy loop in Bash and that's not what
happens in bu
On 08/01/23 10:47 +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo said ...
> Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This worked correctly in Bash 2.05 but has been broken since 2.05a.
>
> These shells are also OK:
>
> csh 20070713-1
> pdksh 5.2.14-21
> tcsh 6.14.00-7
> zsh 4.0.6-18
> zsh 4.3.4-dev
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This worked correctly in Bash 2.05 but has been broken since 2.05a.
These shells are also OK:
csh 20070713-1
pdksh 5.2.14-21
tcsh 6.14.00-7
zsh 4.0.6-18
zsh 4.3.4-dev-7-2
pgpB8J6iHxDrK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So what is the real reason of this bug, elinks
> is somehow confused whether it is at foreground?
The reason is that "fg" in Bash nowadays does not send SIGCONT to
the job if Bash has seen from waitpid() that the job is already
running. ELinks expects t