Re: [elinks-dev] What to do with ELinks 0.10.6.GIT

2007-01-05 Thread Adam Golebiowski
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:41:35AM +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
 If this is OK with Fonseca and others then I can do these.

What about releasing 0.10.7 together with a notice that this is the last
release of the 0.10.x branch and it will be no longer maintained?

On the other hand, I don't know if there are 0.10.x users out there
(apart of Debian), so maybe it doesn't really matter.

-- 
 http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
   PLD Linux developer| Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.


pgpo5yLzJOlCa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
elinks-dev mailing list
elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev


Re: [elinks-dev] What to do with ELinks 0.10.6.GIT

2007-01-05 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Adam Golebiowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 What about releasing 0.10.7 together with a notice that this is the last
 release of the 0.10.x branch and it will be no longer maintained?

I don't see why anyone should want to upgrade to 0.10.7 but not
to 0.11.2, especially if 0.10.7 were the last release and any
new bugs introduced in it were not going to be fixed.


pgpmHhBrNiTiQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
elinks-dev mailing list
elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev


[elinks-dev] What to do with ELinks 0.10.6.GIT

2007-01-04 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
ELinks 0.10.6 was released on 2005-09-15.  It seems that after
the release, bug fixes were first backported until 2005-09-23,
and then the branch was dormant until I backported some recent
fixes on 2006-11-26 and later.  So most bugs fixed in 0.11.* or
0.12.GIT after the release have presumably not been tested on
0.10.6.  The question is now whether we should test the bugs and
backport the fixes or just declare the 0.10 branch unmaintained.

The stable Debian 3.1 sarge includes ELinks 0.10.4 and the
Debian security team backports security fixes to it.  I don't
think releasing 0.10.7 with all known bugfixes backported would
really help that.

In any case, I think there should be an official list of which
development branches are maintained and need to be considered
when bugs are being fixed.

I propose:
- Remove ELinks 0.10.6 from http://elinks.cz/download.html,
  but keep it in http://elinks.cz/download/.
- Add to http://elinks.cz/download.html a note saying that only
  the stable 0.11 branch and 0.12.GIT are maintained and that bug
  fixes will not be backported to earlier versions.
- Add to http://elinks.cz/feedback.html a note saying that the
  maintained releases are listed in http://elinks.cz/download.html
  and that bugs of earlier versions are unlikely to get fixed.
  (Reporting the bugs may be useful though, as it gives other
  users an incentive to upgrade.)
- Announce to elinks-users that ELinks 0.10.* is no longer
  maintained and that users should upgrade to 0.11.2.
- Add that announcement to http://elinks.cz/news.html as well.

If this is OK with Fonseca and others then I can do these.


pgpLN8YV4Y990.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
elinks-dev mailing list
elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev