Re: [elinks-dev] Patch for porting Elinks to OpenSolaris

2009-03-16 Thread Muktha Narayan
Hi Kalle, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo k...@iki.fi writes: However I've now looked at C99 6.7.4p3 and it specifically mentions modifiable objects. So I wonder if we could just put some const in elinks_ulongcat to make the objects unmodifiable. I have pushed

Re: [elinks-dev] Patch for porting Elinks to OpenSolaris

2009-03-04 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Muktha Narayan muktha.nara...@sun.com writes: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote: Because ELinks is violating a C99 requirement, rather than something specific to Sun, I don't think it's right to make an exception for the Sun compiler. Instead, we should make the functions not inline and measure

Re: [elinks-dev] Patch for porting Elinks to OpenSolaris

2009-02-24 Thread Muktha Narayan
Hi, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote: Mark A. Carlson mark.carl...@sun.com writes: +#if defined (__SUNPRO_C) +static inline void +#else inline void +#endif load_frames(struct session *ses, struct document_view *doc_view) This looks like http://bugzilla.elinks.cz/show_bug.cgi?id=1047.

Re: [elinks-dev] Patch for porting Elinks to OpenSolaris

2009-02-18 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Mark A. Carlson mark.carl...@sun.com writes: +#if defined (__SUNPRO_C) +static inline void +#else inline void +#endif load_frames(struct session *ses, struct document_view *doc_view) This looks like http://bugzilla.elinks.cz/show_bug.cgi?id=1047. That bug was reported against ELinks