Re: [elinks-dev] [PATCH] configure.in: add a missing AC_LANG_PROGRAM macro

2013-09-18 Thread Kamil Dudka 
On Monday 25 February 2013 15:45:32 Kamil Dudka wrote:
 ... around the first argument of AC_COMPILE_IFELSE in order to eliminate
 warnings with autoconf 2.68.
 ---
  configure.in |4 ++--
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
 index 023af06..9d992ee 100644
 --- a/configure.in
 +++ b/configure.in
 @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ AC_STRUCT_TM
  AC_C_CONST
  AC_C_INLINE
  AC_MSG_CHECKING([[for C99-conforming inline]])
 -AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[
 +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[
   int add(int change);
 
   static int sum;
 @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[
   sub(int change)
   {
   return add(-change);
 - }]],
 + }]])],
   [AC_MSG_RESULT([[yes]])
AC_DEFINE([NONSTATIC_INLINE], [inline],
   [Define as inline if the compiler lets you declare a function 
 without
  inline, then define it with inline, and have that definition refer to
  identifiers with internal linkage.  This is allowed by C99 6.7.4p6 and
  6.7.4p3 together.  Otherwise define as nothing.])],

The above patch still applies.  Any chance to get this in?  Thanks in advance!

Kamil
___
elinks-dev mailing list
elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev

Re: [elinks-dev] [PATCH] configure.in: add a missing AC_LANG_PROGRAM macro

2013-09-18 Thread Witold Filipczyk 
W dniu 18.09.2013 o 12:48 Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com pisze:

 On Monday 25 February 2013 15:45:32 Kamil Dudka wrote:
 ... around the first argument of AC_COMPILE_IFELSE in order to eliminate
 warnings with autoconf 2.68.
 ---
  configure.in |4 ++--
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
 index 023af06..9d992ee 100644
 --- a/configure.in
 +++ b/configure.in
 @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ AC_STRUCT_TM
  AC_C_CONST
  AC_C_INLINE
  AC_MSG_CHECKING([[for C99-conforming inline]])
 -AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[
 +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[
  int add(int change);

  static int sum;
 @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[
  sub(int change)
  {
  return add(-change);
 -}]],
 +}]])],
  [AC_MSG_RESULT([[yes]])
   AC_DEFINE([NONSTATIC_INLINE], [inline],
  [Define as inline if the compiler lets you declare a function 
 without
  inline, then define it with inline, and have that definition refer to
  identifiers with internal linkage.  This is allowed by C99 6.7.4p6 and
  6.7.4p3 together.  Otherwise define as nothing.])],

 The above patch still applies.  Any chance to get this in?  Thanks in  
 advance!

Added to the master branch. Thanks!
___
elinks-dev mailing list
elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev