Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See also: http://bugs.debian.org/331409#57
Thank you for the pointer. However, I think it would be wrong
to reopen bug 331409 for the Bash-ELinks interaction, because
it was originally about a busy loop in Bash and that's not what
happens in bug
On 08/01/23 23:28 +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo said ...
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See also: http://bugs.debian.org/331409#57
Thank you for the pointer. However, I think it would be wrong
to reopen bug 331409 for the Bash-ELinks interaction, because
it was
Resending with a X-PTS-Approved header.
On 08/01/23 23:28 +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo said ...
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See also: http://bugs.debian.org/331409#57
Thank you for the pointer. However, I think it would be wrong
to reopen bug 331409 for the
Qingning Huo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what is the real reason of this bug, elinks
is somehow confused whether it is at foreground?
The reason is that fg in Bash nowadays does not send SIGCONT to
the job if Bash has seen from waitpid() that the job is already
running. ELinks expects to
