Note that both IEx and ExUnit already keep a wrapper around inspect as they
do provide default inspecting values, so the explicit approach sounds like
the way to go IMO.
*José Valim*
www.plataformatec.com.br
Skype: jv.ptec
Founder and Director of R
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 9:14 PM wrote:
> >
> Couldn't you define a method like __record_keys__/0 on the atom in the
defrecord call?
Yes. To be concrete, this is how it could work:
```
defmodule Records do
import Record
defrecord :a, [:x, :y]
defrecord :b, [:x, :y]
end
iex> Records.__records__()
[
a: [:x, :y],
b: [:x, :y]
]
Hey
Unlike structs there's no guarantee that two records won't be defined with
the same name, they are scoped within modules.
Cheers,
Louis
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 at 13:55 Allen Madsen wrote:
> Couldn't you define a method like __record_keys__/0 on the atom in the
> defrecord call?
>
> Allen
Couldn't you define a method like __record_keys__/0 on the atom in the
defrecord call?
Allen Madsen
http://www.allenmadsen.com
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:49 AM wrote:
> One way to avoid issues with state is to avoid... state. Maybe we'd
> configure it like this:
>
> records = [
> # explicit
