Hm, looks legit. Thanks for the explanation!
Alessio
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 8:39 PM José Valim wrote:
> There are constructs that rely on this. For example, if you want to have a
> receive without clauses, only with an after, you would do:
>
> receive do
> after 30_000 -> IO.puts "waited 30s"
Ah, I see now in the project configuration. I also see that `umbrella?`
would only return true inside the umbrella the root project, because it
defines `apps_paths`. In theory, a home solution to this would be to simply
define a `umbrella_path` in all of my apps. Alright, that definitely makes
sens
There are constructs that rely on this. For example, if you want to have a
receive without clauses, only with an after, you would do:
receive do
after 30_000 -> IO.puts "waited 30s"
end
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 5:28 PM Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana <
dottorblas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
> A warn
Yes, because it is configured in the mix.exs of that application to do so.
All behavior is opt-in, there is no magic detection. You have to do the
same.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Hi!
A warning would be great so one could watch on them using `mix compile
--warnings-as-errors` :-)
Alessio
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 5:16 PM Andrea Leopardi
wrote:
> It can't error out on compilation because it would be a breaking change.
> However, personally I'm not against a compilation warn
Ok, a warning is enough then, in case you cannot remember of a reason to
not emit the warning :-)
quarta-feira, 24 de Junho de 2020 às 16:16:12 UTC+1, Andrea Leopardi
escreveu:
>
> It can't error out on compilation because it would be a breaking change.
> However, personally I'm not against a c
Except doesn't deps_path inside an application that is a part of an umbrella
application return the umbrella's deps directory?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
It can't error out on compilation because it would be a breaking change.
However, personally I'm not against a compilation warning here, but there's
a chance we decided to not emit that for a reason that I can't recall right
now 😅
Andrea
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 13:19, Mário Guimarães <
mario.luis.
Hi, thank you for your quick reply. I checked for pagination support in
Erlang before opening this topic and yes, it's not supported in erl as
well. I'm surprised no one needed this before. I wonder if I'm missing
something and there's a logic behind not implementing this.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at
IEx uses erlang shell so such capability should be added there first and then
IEx will get it for free.
> On 24 Jun 2020, at 15:12, Bülent Erdemir wrote:
>
> Hi, is it possible to have pagination for help content in iex ? It's been
> discussed earlier in around 2013 but not implemented since t
Hi, is it possible to have pagination for help content in iex ? It's been
discussed earlier in around 2013 but not implemented since then. Maybe
there's a valid reason not to. However, I'd prefer to have man pages like
pagination while viewing a documention..
Regards,
Bulent Erdemir
--
You re
Hello,
I just observed the following cases
iex(3)> if true do
...(3)> else
...(3)> :ok
...(3)> end
nil
iex(4)> if false do
...(4)> :ok
...(4)> else
...(4)> end
nil
iex(5)> if :anything do
...(5)> else
...(5)> end
nil
iex(6)>
Should't they give a compilation error instead due to the empty blocks?
Hi Kurtis,
If I understand your description correctly, this is by design. An
application inside an umbrella doesn't know it belongs to an umbrella
because you should be able to also run it in isolation. That's why we
explicitly have configs tha point to the parent directory.
Your solution is to
13 matches
Mail list logo
