I use a lot of structs, so I'd like this shorthand. I don't think wrapping
the current syntax in a module is a problem though.
You couldn't really implement this as a macro and save any typing as you'd
need to require the macro before using it, which would probably be about
the same amount of char
I think the nature of structs in their present state—being visually tied to
a `defmodule`—limits the thinking around them. I think that given the
ability to create structs "at-will", opportunities will present themselves
where one would've previously used a tuple or a plain map.
Some contrived
