>From what I've been reading on wasm is that pretty much everyone is waiting 
on the GC feature. 1.0 is more of a foot in the door release.

On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 12:01:34 PM UTC-5, Brian Cardarella wrote:
>
> Confirm, for wasm 1.0. 1.1 is targeting GC
>
> On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 11:57:06 AM UTC-5, Lance Halvorsen wrote:
>>
>> My understanding was that previously, web assembly didn't support 
>> automated GC, so that only languages with manual memory management were 
>> viable options. Has that changed?
>> .L
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:54 AM, José Valim <jose....@plataformatec.com.br
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> If someone wants to tackle this, there are some options to be taken:
>>>
>>> 1. Compile Erlang Abstract Code to asm.js
>>>
>>> 2. Compile Core Erlang to asm.js
>>>
>>> 3. Rely on the llvm backend for hipe, which compiles to native, to 
>>> compile to webassembly instead
>>>
>>> 4. Experimental: Compile Elixir AST to asm.js. We have spent the last 
>>> weeks improving the Elixir compiler to allow Elixir developers to work on 
>>> the Elixir AST instead of the formats above. The advantage of doing so is 
>>> that you can introduce constructs to the Elixir syntax that targets 
>>> specific backends
>>>
>>> If someone is interested in playing with any of those options and you 
>>> would like to chat about it, please ping me on IRC or privately by e-mail.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *José Valim*
>>> www.plataformatec.com.br
>>> Skype: jv.ptec
>>> Founder and Director of R&D
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Brian Cardarella <br...@dockyard.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bringing this back up as it never got any traction.
>>>>
>>>> I'm seeing more and more of Elixir's competing languages getting some 
>>>> attention for web assembly:
>>>>
>>>> Rust: https://davidmcneil.github.io/the-rusty-web/
>>>> Go: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18892
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts on discussion around an Elixir effort?
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 7:40:33 AM UTC-4, Brian Cardarella 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is more of a "what if?" post than anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am curious if there has been any discussion on either the Elixir 
>>>>> side or Erlang side around Web Assembly. Is it a viable compilation 
>>>>> target? 
>>>>> Could there be benefits to the Elixir community? What type of efforts 
>>>>> would 
>>>>> be necessary to make this a reality?
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to elixir-lang-co...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/a437e695-d491-4abc-8a73-505912bcb79f%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/a437e695-d491-4abc-8a73-505912bcb79f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to elixir-lang-co...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4%2B0iKCo016y%2BFBVgXYh47eNAiGzatHrtEbZVqgbbREe3A%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4%2B0iKCo016y%2BFBVgXYh47eNAiGzatHrtEbZVqgbbREe3A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/f3fc0bd4-285f-47e3-9cef-38672471c043%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to