Re: [elixir-core:10845] Re: [Proposal] `start_link_supervised`

I'm happy to take a stab at it, whichever direction we want to go. On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 7:53 AM Andrea Leopardi wrote: > Hey there, > > I like this idea. I don't feel strongly on whether this is a new pair of > functions (start_supervised_link/2 and start_supervised_link!/2) or if this > is

[elixir-core:10845] Re: [Proposal] `start_link_supervised`

Hey there, I like this idea. I don't feel strongly on whether this is a new pair of functions (start_supervised_link/2 and start_supervised_link!/2) or if this is a callout in the docs for the existing start_supervised* functions, but I like the idea of having one of those two  If others in

[elixir-core:10847] [Proposal] - Add an option to deps.get to force failure on lock mismatch

If dependencies in the mix.lock do not match those in mix.exs, *mix deps.get --strict* will exit with an error, instead of updating the mix.lock file. This is inspired by npm ci and aims to