Re: [elixir-core:5895] Bug when in string interpolation?

2016-06-01 Thread eksperimental
great, just wanted to make sure this was the intented behaviour. Good to know and remember the are not the same. On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:07:50 +0200 José Valim wrote: > No because interpolation uses the Strint.Chars protocol that defines a > different behavior

Re: [elixir-core:5894] Test grouping and named setups

2016-06-01 Thread Greg Vaughn
My contribution to the bikeshed ;-) "regarding" and/or its abbreviation "re" -Greg Vaughn > On Jun 1, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Onorio Catenacci wrote: > > Or even scenario: > > scenario "parsing invalid data" do >test "negative integers are rejected" do: ... > end > > -- >

Re: [elixir-core:5894] Test grouping and named setups

2016-06-01 Thread Onorio Catenacci
Or even scenario: scenario "parsing invalid data" do test "negative integers are rejected" do: ... end -- Onorio On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 1:29:11 PM UTC-4, Bruce Tate wrote: > > scene is very nice. > > -bt > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Ciarán Walsh >

Re: [elixir-core:5892] Test grouping and named setups

2016-06-01 Thread Bruce Tate
scene is very nice. -bt On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Ciarán Walsh wrote: > I was thinking `scene`: > > scene "parsing invalid data" do > test "negative integers are rejected" do: ... > end > > On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 7:30:19 PM UTC+1, Jamu Kakar wrote: >> >>

[elixir-core:5892] Re: Elixir v1.3.0-rc.0 released

2016-06-01 Thread Myron Marston
The new 1.3 features look really great! Any idea when 1.3.0-rc.0 will be available on hex so it can be used on travis? On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 6:41:32 AM UTC-7, José Valim wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > We are glad to announce our first release candidate for Elixir v1.3.0. > This release

Re: [elixir-core:5889] Bug when in string interpolation?

2016-06-01 Thread José Valim
No because interpolation uses the Strint.Chars protocol that defines a different behavior for nil while Atom.to_string keeps a literal conversion. On Wednesday, June 1, 2016, eksperimental wrote: > I came across when writing a macro that created functions after