Sounds good to me. PR is welcome!
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 8:50 AM Christopher Keele
wrote:
> This is a compelling notion to me.
>
> I'd prefer an implementation where the default was generic and the
> use-case was specific; ie have the complier return 1's for compilation
> errors/other, and
This is a compelling notion to me.
I'd prefer an implementation where the default was generic and the use-case
was specific; ie have the complier return 1's for compilation errors/other,
and have specific CLI use-cases extend the semantics, like mix test
returning 2 for test failures.
On
