I don't see a reason why we wouldn't return the same order. You can easily
get the ones you want by `for {task, {:ok, value}} <- result do`. Plus
forcing people to iterate will remind them that they most likely need to
shutdown the other tasks.
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 3:57 PM thia.md...@gmail.com
> In this sense, yield_many becomes a special case of yield_first where you
want to yield on all given tasks.
I'm not sure if we would want that, because in yield_many the returned list
will be in the same order as the tasks supplied in the tasks input
argument.
However yield_first to
