Yes, please go ahead.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:41 AM Felipe Stival wrote:
> We have Map.pop/2,3, Keyword.pop/2,3, so I think that, for coherency, we
> should also have default return support on Access.pop.
>
> This would require no additional callbacks, just a minor addition in the
> Access.pop
We have Map.pop/2,3, Keyword.pop/2,3, so I think that, for coherency, we
should also have default return support on Access.pop.
This would require no additional callbacks, just a minor addition in the
Access.pop implementation.
I can send a PR if you agree.
--
You received this message
