>>
>>
>> *José Valim*
>> www.plataformatec.com.br
>> Skype: jv.ptec
>> Founder and Director of R
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Brian Cardarella <br...@dockyard.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I am doing some meta progr
Actually, I may have solve my problem by reversing everything. :p
On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 4:04:13 AM UTC-5, Brian Cardarella wrote:
>
> The problem is the compilation order. The relationship between mod A & B
> is being written in __before_compile__ for each module. m
This is assuming that all nested values are maps all the way down. What
happens in the event of a Keyword list for example? Or a tuple? If the
use-case is limiting itself to just maps of maps this works. But if the
wider use-case should be supported it may make sense to consider a
When using `with` there are several times I wish I could have reached
deeper into a Map or Keyword list in a single line rather than multiple
fetch statements. Ideally it would work like this:
```
map = %{foo: %{bar: "baz"}}
%{:ok, "bar"} = fetch_in(map, [:foo, :bar])
:error = fetch_in(map,
allenmadsen.com
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Allen Madsen <allen.c...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > +1 from me. Seems consistent with `get_in` and `put_in` and follows
> > the semantics of `fetch`.
> > Allen Madsen
> > http://www.allenmadsen.com
> >
gt;> would like to chat about it, please ping me on IRC or privately by e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>> *José Valim*
>> www.plataformatec.com.br
>> Skype: jv.ptec
>> Founder and Director of R
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Brian Cardarella <
>From what I've been reading on wasm is that pretty much everyone is waiting
on the GC feature. 1.0 is more of a foot in the door release.
On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 12:01:34 PM UTC-5, Brian Cardarella wrote:
>
> Confirm, for wasm 1.0. 1.1 is targeting GC
>
> On Wednesday
If I quote the following:
Code.string_to_quoted """
if foo do
"true"
else
"false"
end
"""
I get the following AST:
{:if, [line: 1], [{:foo, [line: 1], nil}, [do: "true", else: "false"]]}
Which makes sense to me as the last node is a list. However, `when` seems
to follow
1 == 2)
> {:==, [context: Elixir, import: Kernel], [1, 2]}
>
> In case of def, the left side (of the operator) is the call and right the
> guards.
>
> Michał.
>
> On 9 Mar 2017, 12:42 +0100, Brian Cardarella <br...@dockyard.com
> >, wrote:
>
> If I quote the follow
Check out the code link for: https://hexdocs.pm/ecto/Ecto.Query.html#where/3
It
references:
https://github.com/elixir-ecto/ecto/blob/v2.1.4/lib/ecto/query.ex#L794
Which doesn't exist because the release wasn't tagged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi everybody, please excuse the off-top(ish) post. The 2020 Elixir
Ecosystem Survey has been released. We'd like to capture as wide an
audience as possible so please take some time to complete the survey and if
you can distribute it to colleagues / organizations that would be much
appeciated.
11 matches
Mail list logo
