Hi Sergiy
I'm afraid I don't follow. From what I understand of your proposal the
current defguard system meets your needs- what are you looking to add?
Cheers,
Louis
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 18:38 Sergiy Kukunin wrote:
> I afraid you missed my point, I might have expressed it poorly. Let's
>
I afraid you missed my point, I might have expressed it poorly. Let's
assume I have a simple type: {is_atom(), is_number(), is_binary()}. I want
to define a guard to match it. Without reusing I can write a function
accepting it:
func({x, y, z}) when is_atom(x) and is_number(y) and
