You were probably confusing it with a type alias, which is often used with
records, right?
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 9:28:49 PM UTC-5, Luis Fei wrote:
>
> Oh, it's just union types, got it, thank you, Janis
>
> On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:02:13 PM UTC+8, Janis Voigtländer wrote:
>>
>>
Oh, it's just union types, got it, thank you, Janis
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:02:13 PM UTC+8, Janis Voigtländer wrote:
>
> Would you have been more comfortable if the definition would have been
> like the following?
>
> type Config data msg =
> ConfigConstructor
> { toId : data -> S
Would you have been more comfortable if the definition would have been like
the following?
type Config data msg =
ConfigConstructor
{ toId : data -> String
, toMsg : State -> msg
, columns : List (ColumnData data msg)
, customizations : Customizations data msg
}
If yes, then
Hello, I just tried to look into elm-sortable-table's source code, and this
`Config` type got me confused
https://github.com/evancz/elm-sortable-table/blob/master/src/Table.elm#L96-L102
I'll paste it here for convenience
type Config data msg =
Config
{ toId : data -> String
, toMsg :
