I'm sure many of you have sen Richard Feldmans amazing talk on impossible 
states from Elm conf. In there he uses a Union Type for working with his 
data
History = 
History =
{ current: Question
, others: List Question }

This essentially means every time we want to update something in the 
History, we'll have to use the "History" - constructor instead of the 
regular record update syntax ( { questions | ... } ). How does this impact 
performance? I've heard that regular record updates essentially reuses 
everything that hasn't been changed. But when we are using a constructor - 
do we get any reuse or are we creating a whole new questions object under 
the hood?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to