This would probably come in handy later, but for now I really enjoy having
elm-make as my only build step. 邏
On Monday, August 28, 2017 at 4:28:03 PM UTC+3, Robin Heggelund Hansen
wrote:
>
> You can use the Elm debugger just fine with, say, webpack. Just pass in
> the `debugger: true` flag and
You can use the Elm debugger just fine with, say, webpack. Just pass in the
`debugger: true` flag and you're good to go.
søndag 27. august 2017 10.16.08 UTC+2 skrev Vlad GURDIGA følgende:
>
> Hey Robin!
>
> Thank you for checking and thinking about my exploration here!
>
> On Thursday,
Hey Robin!
Thank you for checking and thinking about my exploration here!
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 11:31:20 AM UTC+3, Robin Heggelund Hansen
wrote:
>
> Won't this break the reactor/debugger? You can't really tell what sort of
> messages is being passed around in your application
Won't this break the reactor/debugger? You can't really tell what sort of
messages is being passed around in your application with this model, if you
want to export message history, it would fail as well I believe.
I think a better way would be to not have nested components. Keep your
entire
