On Friday, January 6, 2017 at 10:31:47 PM UTC, Birowsky wrote:
>
> It's not such a bummer since i can simply compose the reusable dom within
> Elm and I haven't had issues with shady dom, I'm just afraid what other
> Elm/Polymer inconsistencies are there..
>
Quite a few no doubt.
--
You
It's actually true, Rupert. Earlier with Josh from daily drips we
discovered that adding gives it a place to put the light-dom.
I haven't mentioned it yet, because it only works for shady dom if NO shady
dom is being used :/
Simply put, the template must look exactly like this
.
It's not
On Friday, January 6, 2017 at 10:12:09 PM UTC, Rupert Smith wrote:
>
> On Friday, January 6, 2017 at 4:47:02 PM UTC, Birowsky wrote:
>>
>> Altho we've reached consistency, the `swiper-node` is not being rendered.
>> U know how when you hover a dom element in the inspector, it highlights in
>>
On Friday, January 6, 2017 at 4:47:02 PM UTC, Birowsky wrote:
>
> Altho we've reached consistency, the `swiper-node` is not being rendered.
> U know how when you hover a dom element in the inspector, it highlights in
> the render window? Well, hovering on any of the `swiper-node` children,
>
If anyone's hungry for points, here's a Stack Overflow
version: http://stackoverflow.com/q/41510541/592641
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to