The most important one I keep coming back to is the design principle of
rigorously separating functions and data - don't keep functions in your
model, etc.
In many ways I jumped on Elm just because it felt so immediately *right*
and natural, as opposed to "I heard Elm was great but now I have
Immutability
On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 2:37:33 PM UTC+5:30, Peter Damoc wrote:
>
> "The fundamental fact about learning: Anything is easy if you can
> assimilate it to your collection of models. If you can't, anything can be
> painfully difficult.” - Seymour Papert
>
> I'm trying to come
Not so much Elm itself, but functional programming in general.
What wouldn't lodge into my thinking was: immutability + the complete lack
of variables + and no global scope.
How do you achieve stuff if you can't write x = x + 1 ?
It took me ages to get comfortable with the functional way of
