subject:"\[elm\-discuss\] Unsafe mechanism"

Re: [elm-discuss] Unsafe mechanism

2017-03-13 Thread Peter Damoc

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Oliver Searle-Barnes wrote: > What do you think, does this offer a practical route to a greater number > of pure Elm integration libraries? > I seriously doubt it. The practical route is actually joining forces. It is using multiple pairs of

[elm-discuss] Unsafe mechanism

2017-03-13 Thread Oliver Searle-Barnes

(prompted by discussion of firebase integration on elm-dev) Given that it would be really helpful to have more integration libraries available for Elm (auth0, firebase, aws...) I've been wondering if the current state of affairs is ideal for achieving: 1) Maximum number of integration