[elm-discuss] Re: Task ports: A proposal to make it easier to integrate JS with Elm.

+1 for Task ports. On Friday, 14 April 2017 20:32:24 UTC+2, Nicholas Hollon wrote: > > The process: > > 1. Share your ideas, experience, & code on elm-discuss. > 2. Accept that you have no direct influence over what Evan works on next. > 3. Look at the release history

[elm-discuss] Re: Task ports: A proposal to make it easier to integrate JS with Elm.

The process: 1. Share your ideas, experience, & code on elm-discuss. 2. Accept that you have no direct influence over what Evan works on next. 3. Look at the release history for Elm. Notice that changes happen slowly. Notice that improvements to the JavaScript

[elm-discuss] Re: using Elm for browser extensions?

I also found this (for reference here): https://mixandgo.com/blog/writing-a-chrome-extension-with-elm On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 4:34:23 AM UTC, Rich Morin wrote: > > I have a browser extension I want to write and I'm wondering how hard it > would be to do so in Elm. Can anyone point me to

[elm-discuss] Re: Task ports: A proposal to make it easier to integrate JS with Elm.

What is the process for requesting these sort of features? Is there one? On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 10:31:07 AM UTC-5, James Wilson wrote: > > The problem > > ports as they stand are fundamentally incompatible with Tasks. Being > backed by Cmd's, they are harder to compose. A frustration of