I like ruby's "select" and "reject", for precisely the same reason.
martin On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Kasey Speakman <kjspeak...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe filter is a pretty standard name for this. Even Javascript has > Array.filter > <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/filter> > with the same semantics. > > In .NET Linq uses `.Where`, but I believe that is mainly to have > similarity with SQL. > > > On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 2:35:45 PM UTC-5, Duane Johnson wrote: >> >> I saw @_chunglou's tweet >> <https://twitter.com/_chenglou/status/788165827560214528> yesterday and >> wondered if this had been discussed before: >> >> "I can never, ever remember whether `filter` needs `true` or `false`. >> `keep` would be a nicer name." >> >> I agree `keep` would remove the ambiguity. Thoughts? >> >> -- Duane >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
