... I do not think of those commands that I do not have a key
binding for in my Emacs as "left overs".
My wording was poor. I meant `used less frequently' -- remaining
after giving out the keybindings.
Thus, I use C-t (transpose-chars) and M-t (transpose-words) fairly
frequently, but trans
Robert J. Chassell wrote:
The reason why using "M-x" does not appeal to me
is that I don't think of that as the central
feature of Emacs. ...
Indeed, "M-x" is designed for commands that do not have a short key
sequence. It is for commands that are `left over' from frequent use.
I can
"Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At least, with the image of a Gnu head, no novice is going to think
> that Emacs is a Gnu, although they might wonder about the connection
> between GNU Emacs and an operating system with a Linux kernel.
Please get your proselytizing module check
The reason why using "M-x" does not appeal to me
is that I don't think of that as the central
feature of Emacs. ...
Indeed, "M-x" is designed for commands that do not have a short key
sequence. It is for commands that are `left over' from frequent use.
I know I use a control command, l
Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These are on the web now, on
> http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/NewIcons.html, together with the Gimp
> sources that David sent me. Look after David on the page.
> Personally I would like that kind of finishing on my suggestions with
> M-x. The small vers
Actually, "M-x" could reasonably be mispronounced as "Emacs"...
That is cute.
The reason why using "M-x" does not appeal to me
is that I don't think of that as the central
feature of Emacs. If someone asked me to name
the most important Emacs features, M-x wouldn't
make it on the list.
___
> I see no sense in an Emacs icon that would say "M-x".
Actually, "M-x" could reasonably be mispronounced as "Emacs"...
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
Richard M. Stallman wrote:
I see no sense in an Emacs icon that would say "M-x".
If it says anything, it should be "Emacs" or an "E".
A picture of a GNU makes no sense as the icon for Emacs in
particular.
I believe that whether some special symbol in the icon make sense
depends on the circum
I see no sense in an Emacs icon that would say "M-x".
If it says anything, it should be "Emacs" or an "E".
A picture of a GNU makes no sense as the icon for Emacs in
particular.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
I like these icons pretty well, but I sure would like to get advice
from someone who knows more about them than I do.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
Juri Linkov wrote:
IMHO, your M-x is the best icon among other suggestions. It has no
...
I have only one question with this icon. The gnu head on the icon is
looking to the right, whereas the gnu on the original picture (on the
splash screen) is looking to the left. Such difference ca
> Personally I would like that kind of finishing on my suggestions with
> M-x. The small version Gian was kind to make for me is very good, but
> the 48x48 of my M-x picture does not at all have this nice finishing.
IMHO, your M-x is the best icon among other suggestions. It has no
drawbacks ment
David PONCE wrote:
Hi All,
Attached you will find a new icon for Emacs. This is just an idea, so
don't blame me for it, I am not an "artist" ;-)
There are two variants: with a transparent background (image names
with "-t" suffix), and with a light gray gradient background. Included
are 48x48
Michael Cadilhac wrote:
Attached you will find a new icon for Emacs. This is just an idea, so
Whatever! I really like these icons :-)
They look good with 24bit color. I wonder if they would still be
readable with 8 bit or lower displays though.
I don't see the value in adding the
Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Attached you will find a new icon for Emacs. This is just an idea, so
>
> Not to be picky or anything (ahem), but really how did you end up deciding
> to send those icons in the form of a tar.gz attachment rather than just
> a few image attachment (wh
> Attached you will find a new icon for Emacs. This is just an idea, so
Not to be picky or anything (ahem), but really how did you end up deciding
to send those icons in the form of a tar.gz attachment rather than just
a few image attachment (which could then be readily viewed directly in any
nor
Hi All,
Attached you will find a new icon for Emacs. This is just an idea, so
don't blame me for it, I am not an "artist" ;-)
There are two variants: with a transparent background (image names
with "-t" suffix), and with a light gray gradient background. Included
are 48x48 and 16x16 pixels image
17 matches
Mail list logo
