Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-05-10 Thread =?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?=
Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have actually done this now. I found it compelling for several reasons: > > 1) It was a lot easier to do than I thought it would be. > 2) Normal tooltips and GUD tooltips can be toggled independently. > 3) The define lists for macro expansion need only

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-05-07 Thread Richard Stallman
GUD tooltips are now toggled by the minor mode gud-tooltip-mode independenttly of normal tooltips. However, in the manual it may still look as if they depend on tooltip-mode being enabled. You might want to change this. Would you please change this in the manual? __

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-05-06 Thread Nick Roberts
> This solves enough problems that I think it can be installed now. I've installed these changes. I've added an entry in NEWS and partly updated the Emacs manual. GUD tooltips are now toggled by the minor mode gud-tooltip-mode independenttly of normal tooltips. However, in the manual it may sti

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-05-06 Thread Richard Stallman
This solves enough problems that I think it can be installed now. ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-05-05 Thread Nick Roberts
> GUD tooltips need some disentangling from the normal tooltips. They're > coded differently and GUD tooltips shouldn't need tooltip-mode enabled > to work: it should be possble to toggle them independently. After that > is done, it should be straightforward to put the code for

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-05-05 Thread Richard Stallman
How about adding an entry to etc/TODO? Please do. ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-05-04 Thread =?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?=
Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > GUD tooltips need some disentangling from the normal tooltips. They're > coded > differently and GUD tooltips shouldn't need tooltip-mode enabled to work: > it > should be possble to toggle them independently. After that is done, it >

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-05-03 Thread Nick Roberts
> Maybe thats a general rule but one needs to be > quantitative. tooltip.el is about 500 lines and about half that > code is for GUD. So maybe 250 lines get loaded in Emacs through > loadup.el but I'm not sure that it amounts to much in memory. On > the other hand, gud.el i

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-04-28 Thread Richard Stallman
Maybe thats a general rule but one needs to be quantitative. tooltip.el is about 500 lines and about half that code is for GUD. So maybe 250 lines get loaded in Emacs through loadup.el but I'm not sure that it amounts to much in memory. On the other hand, gud.el is about 3000 li

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-04-28 Thread =?iso-8859-1?b?Suly9G1l?= Marant
Quoting Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Btw, I have a question not directly related to your patch: why do you > > absolutely need to put gud-specific code within tooltip.el? > > Well, I didn't put them there, but it certainly makes coding easier because > GUD tooltips use a lot of the gene

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-04-27 Thread Nick Roberts
> Btw, I have a question not directly related to your patch: why do you > absolutely need to put gud-specific code within tooltip.el? Well, I didn't put them there, but it certainly makes coding easier because GUD tooltips use a lot of the generic code. > IMHO, tooltip.el shall only provide so

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-04-27 Thread Richard Stallman
This change in cc-mode.el is pretty simple and harmless, so please install it. If the CC mode maintainer objects, he can say so when he gets around to dealing with the issue. ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: Extending GUD tooltips

2005-04-27 Thread Jérôme Marant
Quoting Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This patch extends GUD tooltips to display #define directives over relevant > identifiers when a C program is under the control of GDB but has no child > process i.e the program has either not started, been signalled or exited. Btw, I have a question

Extending GUD tooltips

2005-04-26 Thread Nick Roberts
This patch extends GUD tooltips to display #define directives over relevant identifiers when a C program is under the control of GDB but has no child process i.e the program has either not started, been signalled or exited. Such tooltips could be displayed even if GDB has not been invoked but it