Richard Stallman wrote:
The incorrect structure is in i3, so I think it should eliminate i3.
The criterion for doing so is that i3 is a vchild of its parent
and also has a vchild. That should never occur.
After the code operates on i3, putting it in place of i2, it check if
i3 is a vchild and
> The criterion for doing so is that i3 is a vchild of its parent
> and also has a vchild. That should never occur.
Whoever can do that, please sprinkle some corresponding asserts in the code.
Stefan
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@
The incorrect structure is in i3, so I think it should eliminate i3.
The criterion for doing so is that i3 is a vchild of its parent
and also has a vchild. That should never occur.
After the code operates on i3, putting it in place of i2, it check if
i3 is a vchild and has a vchild. If so, it sho
| W4
W2 |---
| W5
- ---
W3
i1
| \
| i2 (i1) --> w2 (i2)
| ||
| w3 (i1) i3 (i2)
| \
| w4 (i3)
| |
minibufw5 (i3)
That stru
Richard Stallman wrote:
I looked a bit, but I am not sure how it shall work. If I just to three
windows, in the obvious way (C-x 2, C-x 2), I get three windows, one 11
lines, one 12 lines and one 24 lines. This gives me this window
configuration:
0x86b6b10: vchild: 0x861d830, h
I looked a bit, but I am not sure how it shall work. If I just to three
windows, in the obvious way (C-x 2, C-x 2), I get three windows, one 11
lines, one 12 lines and one 24 lines. This gives me this window
configuration:
0x86b6b10: vchild: 0x861d830, hchild: 0x0, next: 0
Richard Stallman wrote:
Can someone please investigate this, and ack?
I looked a bit, but I am not sure how it shall work. If I just to three
windows, in the obvious way (C-x 2, C-x 2), I get three windows, one 11
lines, one 12 lines and one 24 lines. This gives me this window
configuration
