> If you google for old versions of diff-mode.el, you'll see that it
> also had a minor mode.
> Why suggest using a search engine to find old versions of a file in Emacs?
> They are all on savannah.
IIRC the minor mode was only present in diff-mode versions prior to
inclusion in Emacs. B
If you google for old versions of diff-mode.el, you'll see that it also had
a minor mode.
Why suggest using a search engine to find old versions of a file in Emacs?
They are all on savannah.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http
> "Miles" == Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2005/6/29, Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> M-x diff-context->unified
>> M-x diff-unified->context
> These are great commands; I've often wished for a diff-minor-mode or
> something so I could use the various diff-mode commands on a
2005/6/29, Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> M-x diff-context->unified
> M-x diff-unified->context
These are great commands; I've often wished for a diff-minor-mode or
something so I could use the various diff-mode commands on a mail
message in Gnus or something without copying it.
> I think diff -u is better when the goal is to show just the
> differences, but diff -c is better for changes in the middle of
> non-trivial code.
> Different people have different preferences, but I need diff -c.
> diff -u is always hard for me.
Note that M-x load-libray RET diff-mo
I think diff -u is better when the goal is to show just the
differences, but diff -c is better for changes in the middle of
non-trivial code.
Different people have different preferences, but I need diff -c.
diff -u is always hard for me.
Since `default-frame-background-mode' is no
> When sending patches here, would you please use diff -c, not diff -u?
> I find I cannot understand a diff -u patch unless it is very simple.
I think diff -u is better when the goal is to show just the
differences, but diff -c is better for changes in the middle of
non-trivial code.
> When I try
I discovered another bug. On non-window terminals when the background
color of some face is specified, but its foreground is not (and vice versa),
then the inverted face uses the wrong color. These situations are described
by the following excerpts from the face customization buffer:
1.
Thanks for working on this.
When sending patches here, would you please use diff -c, not diff -u?
I find I cannot understand a diff -u patch unless it is very simple.
When I try to read the lines and think about what they do,
I cannot keep track of which lines are old and which are new.
However,
>>> I see there is a bug not caused by my patch:
>>>
>>> emacs -q -nw -rv
>>>
>>> sets the background mode to light on xterm. But since -rv switches
>>> foreground and background, it should switch the background mode too
>>> from light to dark on xterm.
>>
>> I think this is a bug.
>
> There a
10 matches
Mail list logo
