Re: Changing `string-to-int' to `string-to-number'

2005-05-25 Thread Richard Stallman
That was thoughtful of you. Do you have any idea when string-to-number was introduced? In 1993 or earlier. ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Changing `string-to-int' to `string-to-number'

2005-05-25 Thread Bill Wohler
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you have any idea when string-to-number > was introduced? Never mind. I have since read Stefan's note about its existence since at least Emacs 19 which is suits us fine. Thanks. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG I

Re: Changing `string-to-int' to `string-to-number'

2005-05-25 Thread Bill Wohler
Lute Kamstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > string-to-number was introduced in Emacs 19.7. Thanks. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.

Re: Changing `string-to-int' to `string-to-number'

2005-05-25 Thread Lute Kamstra
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Do you have any idea when string-to-number was introduced? I would > like to simply substitute string-to-number for string-to-int, as you > have done, but we are still supporting Emacs 20.7. string-to-number was introduced in Emacs 19.7. Lute. _

Re: Changing `string-to-int' to `string-to-number'

2005-05-25 Thread Bill Wohler
Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are a few groups of files that I don't plan to touch, because > they're, AFAIK, externally maintained efforts and often do take pains > to maintain compatibility with older releases or non-GNU Emacsen, > i.e.: > > - eshell\*.el > - gnus\*.el

Re: Changing `string-to-int' to `string-to-number'

2005-05-09 Thread Juanma Barranquero
Four days ago, I asked: > I have an outstanding patch to more-or-less-globally change > `string-to-int' to `string-to-number' and squash the little warning > buggers. I've received a private mail from someone who didn't object (more or less), and an answer from Richard which was an "OK" of sorts.

Re: Changing `string-to-int' to `string-to-number'

2005-05-06 Thread Richard Stallman
What about obsolete\*.el? Does it make sense? Being in obsolete\ does not mean they're gonna be used with older releases, does it? Nothing in the Emacs distribution is meant for use with older releases. If you want to fix those files, please do. Any comment whether these can/should/m

Re: Changing `string-to-int' to `string-to-number'

2005-05-05 Thread Stefan Monnier
> There are a few groups of files that I don't plan to touch, because > they're, AFAIK, externally maintained efforts and often do take pains > to maintain compatibility with older releases or non-GNU Emacsen, string-to-number AFAIK exists in all versions of (X)Emacs, except maybe Emacs-18, so com