Re: Default custom group

2005-05-18 Thread Katsumi Yamaoka
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Richard Stallman wrote: > Yesterday, I changed my mind and added the ``:group 'something'' > argument to every defgroup, defface and defcustom forms in which > it hasn't been specified in Gnus (the changes will be propagated > into the Emacs trunk after

Re: Default custom group

2005-05-18 Thread Richard Stallman
I'm sorry for insufficient information. It was caused by the following form which didn't specify the parent group. (defgroup smime nil "S/MIME configuration.") That ought to be fixed, and likewise any other defgroups that fail to specify a parent. Yesterday, I changed my m

Re: Default custom group

2005-05-18 Thread Richard Stallman
By the way, I noticed the new bytecomp doesn't warn to the defcustom form in which the parent group is not specified. Strange, I thought I had tested it on that case. I fixed it now. Thanks. ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org htt

Re: Default custom group

2005-05-18 Thread Richard Stallman
I expect to be able to get to any customization group by starting from M-x customize RET and following the links. Groups that indeed don't belong to any parent groups except `emacs' SHOULD have :group 'emacs. I don't see what the problem is. It is not right for these to be first-l

Re: Default custom group

2005-05-18 Thread Katsumi Yamaoka
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Richard Stallman wrote: > I got many warnings when compiling Gnus. For instance: > smime.el:123:1:Warning: defgroup for `smime' fails to specify containing > group > I think that is a real bug. This group should surely be put in > a logical place in the hi

Re: Default custom group

2005-05-18 Thread Richard Stallman
I got many warnings when compiling Gnus. For instance: smime.el:123:1:Warning: defgroup for `smime' fails to specify containing group I think that is a real bug. This group should surely be put in a logical place in the hierarchy. I think there might be customization groups which

Re: Default custom group

2005-05-18 Thread Daniel Brockman
Katsumi Yamaoka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think there might be customization groups which don't belong to > any parent groups except `emacs'. Although it is possible to avoid > warnings by adding the ``:group 'emacs'' parameters, I don't think > it is useful especially for `defgroup'. I ex

Re: Default custom group

2005-05-17 Thread Katsumi Yamaoka
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Richard Stallman wrote: > While cleaning up etc/NEWS I was reminded that the feature > if the default group in defcustom is new in this release. > I have never been happy with this default, and the best time > to change things is now, before we make a release with it.