Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> What is the difference between those two releases? 21.4a seems to have
>> been released 11 days after the former.
>
> In the Emacs 21.4a release, etc/PROBLEMS contains a paragraph explaining
> how to boot
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the difference between those two releases? 21.4a seems to have
> been released 11 days after the former.
In the Emacs 21.4a release, etc/PROBLEMS contains a paragraph explaining
how to bootstrap Emacs on a system running a Linux kernel with
Exec
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/emacs, there are both emacs-21.4.tar.gz
> and emacs-21.4a.tar.gz.
>
> What is the difference between those two releases?
I really don't want to know.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_
>Older releases bring leim-M.N.tar.gz with same version number.
>leim-21.3.tar.gz is exaracted to emacs-21.3/leim/ directory
>by default.
>
>I guess we should make a 21.4 leim file that extracts into
>emacs-21.4/leim. Francesco, could you do that?
Done.
_
Older releases bring leim-M.N.tar.gz with same version number.
leim-21.3.tar.gz is exaracted to emacs-21.3/leim/ directory
by default.
I guess we should make a 21.4 leim file that extracts into
emacs-21.4/leim. Francesco, could you do that?
__
At Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:11:25 +1300,
Nick Roberts wrote:
> > And there is no announcement to to use it nevertheless.
>
> The relevant mailing list is info-gnu-emacs, although I don't think many
> people follow it:
[...]
> (see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu-emacs/2005-02/msg0.htm
> >
> > I could not find leim-21.4.tar.gz (I know that leim was
> > not affected by that change). Should we use leim-21.3.tar.gz
> > with emacs-21.4.tar.gz?
> >
> > Why not?
>
> Older releases bring leim-M.N.tar.gz with same version number.
> leim-21.3.tar.gz is exaracted to
At Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:28:32 -0500,
Richard Stallman wrote:
>
> I could not find leim-21.4.tar.gz (I know that leim was
> not affected by that change). Should we use leim-21.3.tar.gz
> with emacs-21.4.tar.gz?
>
> Why not?
Older releases bring leim-M.N.tar.gz with same version number.
I could not find leim-21.4.tar.gz (I know that leim was
not affected by that change). Should we use leim-21.3.tar.gz
with emacs-21.4.tar.gz?
Why not?
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ema
At Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:50:37 -0500,
Richard Stallman wrote:
> I have made an Emacs 21.4 release with a single security fix.
I could not find leim-21.4.tar.gz (I know that leim was
not affected by that change). Should we use leim-21.3.tar.gz
with emacs-21.4.tar.gz?
Regards,
--
Yoichi NAKAYAMA
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:10:28 -0500, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have made an Emacs 21.4 release with a single security fix.
>
> We noticed.
>
> I am always a day or so behind in sending out mail about anything.
> You can have a long discussion before I have a chance
> I have made an Emacs 21.4 release with a single security fix.
We noticed.
I am always a day or so behind in sending out mail about anything.
You can have a long discussion before I have a chance even to see
the beginning of it. But in some cases you'd probably be better
off if you wait
b) In the CVS version, the version number should likely get bumped to
22.0.50 instead of the current 21.3.50. There is no sense in
making it 21.4.50, anyhow, and it would be quite misleading to have
it stay at 21.3.50, lower than the current released version.
c) all r
13 matches
Mail list logo
